Blackrock New York Municipal Income Trust II is a non-diversified, closed-end municipal bond fund. The Trust's investment objective is to provide current income exempt from regular federal income tax and New York State and New York City personal income taxes. The Trust seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing in municipal bonds exempt from federal income taxes and New York State and New York City personal income taxes. It invests at least 80% of its assets in municipal bonds that are investment grade quality at the time of investment or, if unrated, determined to be of comparable quality by the Trust's investment advisor. It may invest directly in securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives. It invests in various sectors, including county/city/special district/school district, transportation, education, utilities, health, state tax-backed, housing, corporate, local tax-backed and tobacco. BlackRock Advisors, LLC is the investment advisor of the Trust. » Full Overview of BFY ...
+See More2024-05-05 10:31:00 Sunday ET
Stock Synopsis: Pharmaceutical post-pandemic patent development cycle In terms of stock market valuation, the major pharmaceutical sector remains at its
2018-11-05 10:40:00 Monday ET
Former Fed Chair Janet Yellen worries about U.S. government debt accumulation, expects new interest rate increases, and warns of the next economic recession
2024-07-31 09:28:00 Wednesday ET
In the modern monetary system, each new CBDC helps anchor public trust in money in support of economic welfare, especially in a cashless society. In our
2018-03-06 11:35:00 Tuesday ET
The Trump team blocks Broadcom's bid for Qualcomm due to national economic security concerns and 5G telecom network issues. Broadcom makes microchips fo
2018-06-01 07:30:00 Friday ET
The U.S. federal government debt has risen from less than 40% of total GDP about a decade ago to 78% as of May 2018. The Congressional Budget Office predict
2023-08-21 12:25:00 Monday ET
Steven Shavell presents his economic analysis of law in terms of the economic outcomes of both legal doctrines and institutions. Steven Shavell (2004)